HOYLE CONSULTING
  • Home
  • Services
    • Active Communities
    • Complete Streets
    • Bicycling
    • Safe Routes to School
  • About
  • News
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Services
    • Active Communities
    • Complete Streets
    • Bicycling
    • Safe Routes to School
  • About
  • News
  • Contact

Traffic Calming – A Radical Idea in 1995

10/23/2017

0 Comments

 
​When the American Planning Association agreed to publish my Planning Advisory Service report on Traffic Calming in 1995 it was considered a very radical concept. When I took graduate coursework in transportation engineering and planning in the mid-1980’s, streets were very emphatically to be designed to move cars as fast as possible from point A to B. Pedestrians were something to be kept off the streets and bicyclists were not mentioned in the textbooks or classes.
It was when I had the opportunity to live in Bayreuth, Germany in 1989 I came across the Australian report Traffic Calming. Professor Rolf Monheim, faculty at the University of Bayreuth who was an expert in pedestrianization and creating city centers, gave me a copy when he invited me to have coffee at his home. I thought the report needed to be shared in the U.S. to help make our cities safer and more livable.
Picture

​Pedestrian mall, Bayreuth, Germany November 9, 1989, the day the Wall came down.

Knowing that the report would need examples from the U.S. in order to gain any traction, I searched for places that had implemented traffic calming programs. In the early 1990’s only Berkeley, Seattle, and Portland had done much work on calming traffic. I pulled heavily from the groundbreaking work that Donald Appleyard had done in his book Livable Streets and added a chapter on the necessity for public engagement in order for traffic calming to succeed. The opening section of Traffic Calming reads in part:  Traffic calming promises to be an important tool for improving the quality of life in American cities…This report examines the myths of traditional traffic planning and how such planning must change to provide safer streets. 
The PAS report garnered a lot of attention, both positive and negative. To suggest streets should be designed for everyone, including pedestrian and cyclists, was considered naïve if not dangerous by mainstream engineers and most planners. I faced some hostile audiences. One audience at a state conference stands out in my memory as some of the planners in the audience insisted that fire trucks had to be able to make U-turns on residential streets to put out fires. Thankfully, things have changed since ​then and now communities all across the country want to reclaim their streets. It is a beautiful thing to watch unfold!
Picture
0 Comments

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    February 2023
    April 2022
    January 2022
    October 2020
    April 2018
    February 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly